Archive for the ‘Drama Movie Reviews’ Category

Young Adult– Best and Worst Movie Moments from Young Adult

Wednesday, January 4th, 2012

Jason Reitman is one of the freshest directors working today. Jason Reitman makes funny, sharp, bitter comedies that provide some social critique. Each of Mr. Reitman’s films have been better than the previous ones—that is until Young Adult. Young Adult is funny and bitter, but isn’t as sharp, original, and funny that his previous three films. Also, Young Adult seems to not have much to say. There is no damning social criticism or piercing character study (even though Young Adult attempts the latter).

The young adult in question is Mavis Gary, an attractive woman who in a state of arrested development. Mavis Gary (played by the underrated Charlize Theron) was the popular girl is high school who hasn’t grown up (hence, the title, Young Adult) and still thinks she can get what she wants.

Mavis Gary is a ghostwriter for a once popular children’s series of books which now are on the clearance shelf and even at such slashed down prices, have trouble selling.

What Young Adult wants to portray is a character who is unable to understand reality and that what was once popular is no longer. Just like Mavis Gary’s books were popular, now they aren’t. People have their ups and downs as well.

The problem with Young Adult is that the audience knows exactly what is going to happen. The movie is predictable and the film says everything it needs to say in the first 10 minutes and doesn’t progress from there. The film is much like the movie’s main character—Young Adult starts off on fire but after the first 10 minutes just keeps put-put puttering along without knowing that it’s out of gas.

Young Adult is about Mavis Gary’s high school boyfriend, Buddy Slade (played by Patrick Wilson) who is now married with a baby. Mavis plans to drive back to her dead-end hometown and get her boyfriend back. Since Mavis was so popular in school, Mavis thinks that all she has to do is say, “come here, boy” for Buddy to come rolling back into Mavis’s arms.

The movie doesn’t seem to have much to say and is predictable all the way thru. The audience knows that Mavis won’t succeed in breaking up Buddy’s marriage and getting Buddy to fall back in love with her. The audience also knows that when Mavis feels rejected and lonely that she will shack up with the nice unpopular kid from high school, Matt (who is the most dimensional character in the film and is played by Patton Oswalt with both pity and sympathy).

Matt was a victim of a sort of hate-crime when he was in high school. A bunch of bullies beat up Matt, mangled his feet, and bashed his head for being gay, even though Matt isn’t really gay (which is what makes it sort of a hate-crime). Matt lives with his sister, Sandra, who is the only character in the film which admires Mavis; probably because Mavis is the girl Sandra always wishes she could be.

Mavis meets Matt is a bar and they get to talking and become somewhat friends. Matt and Mavis are both two lonely souls without a lot of friends and Mavis leans on Matt whenever she feels rejected. Mavis drives to Matt’s garage and they go out for drinks when Mavis feels the need for company.

The best scene in the film is when Mavis goes to Matt’s place after being rejected by Buddy. Mavis made a fool of herself at Buddy’s daughter’s naming. Mavis feels she needs someone to show her affection, so she goes to Matt’s house, takes off her clothes and fornicates with Matt. Matt is lonely and horny, so he reciprocates. This scene is the most honest and genuine scene in the film. The way Matt quickly takes off his pants, shows that he is eager to just have sex and might not fully care about Mavis’s feelings. And Mavis, likewise takes advantage of Matt’s vulnerability. The scene of Matt and Mavis getting intimate shows a true sex scene—that sometimes people has sex with someone just because they are there and have hormonal needs and not due to feelings of love.

Unfortunately, Young Adult is just an adequate movie. The movie offers chuckles, but no guffaws. Likewise, the movie doesn’t really get too deep into the character’s psyche. It seems to want to say something profound, but doesn’t do so in a way that is original, insightful, or arouses the audiences’ emotions or intellect in any meaningful way.

Every director has its flaws and Young Adult is Jason Reitman’s. Jason Reitman and Diablo Cody’s previous collaboration was Juno (a great film worth seeing). Those expecting something along the lines and quality of Juno will be disappointed.

I was really looking forward to watching Young Adult since Jason Reitman is a talented filmmaker and I’ve really enjoyed his other films. Young Adult is far from awful, it just feels empty with so much lost potential. Young Adult isn’t worth spending over $10 to see in a movie theater, but might be worth watching when it comes on TV and DVD. Until then, this young adult doesn’t recommend seeing Young Adult.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 8.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

The Descendants– Best and Worst Movie Moments from The Descendants

Sunday, November 20th, 2011

In Alexander Payne’s low-key, moving, funny and well acted movie, The Descendants, George Clooney plays Matt King, a lawyer whose wife is in an irreversible coma. The Descendants is Alexander Payne’s first film since 2004’s Sideways, and it’s been way too long since has been behind the camera.

Alexander Payne is one of the best filmmakers working today. His films are modest, biting, and made with both cynicism and a love of humanity. His characters are deeply flawed selfish individuals who the audience can alternately find repulsive and loving. The Descendants is no different.

Matt King’s wife, due to a recent  boating accident has left her into a coma which due to her will, the plug will be pulled in two weeks.

One of the things that I’ve found interesting about humanity is how we treat people differently if they have visible conditions that make their life difficult. If you found out that your friend had cancer, you would probably treat him nicer than if he didn’t have cancer. Many people treat people in wheelchairs nicer (albeit demeaningly) than those who are able-bodied. But why should we? We all have our own baggage and just because our maladies aren’t visible that doesn’t make our life better than those whose maladies are. Shouldn’t we treat people nice whether they have a disease or not? And if we treat someone nicer because he has cancer, isn’t this insincere and demeaning? Do people who are in wheelchairs really need to get special treatment? Can they not handle heartbreak just like everyone else? And if someone wrongs you in a way you find unforgivable should their own misfortune change the way you treat them, even though you feel wronged by them?

The above questions are those which The Descendants ask. Matt King finds out from his daughter, Alexandra (played with sharp wit and intelligence by the unknown and talented Shailene Woodley) that his wife cheated on him. He takes his children to confront the man who slept with his wife. Matt finds out that this guy, Brian Speer (played by Matthew Lillard who proves he can actually play it straight while acting his age and remain fully-dimensional) is married, and Brian’s wife finds out about the affair as well.

While his wife is lying brain-dead in a coma, Matt comes to the hospital and starts yelling at her about how selfish she was and about how wrong it was for her to cheat on him, and that she was selfish and irresponsible to want to leave him and their kids and break up their family to move with Brian. In a later scene, Brian’s wife visits Matt’s wife at the hospital and says that, “I forgive you for sleeping with my husband and for wanting to break up my family. I should hate you but I forgive you.” In another scene, Alexandra visits her mother at the hospital and calls her a whore and how she was wrong to cheat on dad. What makes these scenes funny is how profound they are. It might seem insensitive that Matt, his daughter, and Brian’s wife are so unsympathetic that they would yell at a woman while in a coma, but are they wrong to do this? Matt’s wife (Elizabeth) did act wrong and why should her actions be ignored just because she is in a coma? Does having something bad happen to you mean your sins should be forgiven? I’m not answering these questions, and what makes The Descendants a good movie is that neither does the film; the film just puts such situations out there so you can ponder about these questions yourself.

The Descendants is a road trip movie, where Brian takes his children to Hawaii to confront Brian Speer about the affair. Along with Matt and his two children, his eldest daughter, Alexandra brings her friend Sid (Nick Krause, who is very funny and steals every scene he is in) with them. Sid starts out as a typical surfer-dude type character, but shows depth along the film to make his character more than just a archetype. Sid says what’s on his mind even when inappropriate. When Matt tell’s Elizabeth’s parents that she is in an irreversible coma and is going to die soon. Elizabeth’s father tells his wife (who has Alzheimer’s) that they are going to visit Elizabeth at the hospital. “Really, we are going to visit Queen Elizabeth. How exciting. I always wanted to see a queen.” Sid starts laughing at this and Elizabeth’s father tells him to shut up. Sid doesn’t. “I’m going to punch you,” he says to Sid, which Elizabeth’s father does.

The Descendants doesn’t judge its characters but simply plays events and allows the audience to make their own judgments about them. George Clooney does a great job turning Matt into a moving and sympathetic character (even though he seems to care more about his wife cheating on him than her being in a coma and about to die).

The writing is typical funny and moving Alexander Payne. The directing is modest and there is lovely Hawaiian music in the film. If the film has a flaw it’s that the music is used too much and doesn’t always flow. I wish the music wasn’t used as much as it was. Another misstep is Matt King’s narrating the film. Having a character acting as narrator is a crutch and unless you are Ron Howard in Arrested Development, voice-over narrations should be carefully used. The first 15 minutes or so is almost all narration (it gets a lot better than that afterwards).

Besides for the over-reliance on music and Matt’s narration, The Descendants is a funny, touching, well-written, acted, and directed film that is well worth your time. My only request is that we don’t have to wait another seven years to see Alexander Payne behind the camera.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 5.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)

The Social Network Movie Reviews, Ratings, Trailer and Opinion

Monday, October 4th, 2010

It seems that everyone in the world is on Facebook. Facebook is so incredibly popular it’s used as a verb now. Facebooking as we all know is when you are talking to your friends online and become part of a social network, or so we pretend. What the smart, acidic The Social Network posits is that Facebook isn’t a way to interact with people. It’s a place of narcissism. A webpage devoted to us. When people check out YOUR Facebook page they see how many friends YOU have, what YOU are interested in and YOUR thoughts, no matter how benign.

The Social Network (pejoratively known as “The Facebook movie”)  shows that Facebook wasn’t invented as a way to make friends but as a way to feel good about oneself and to increase ones own feeling of importance. “Look at me! Look how many friends I have and isn’t it interesting when I tell people where I buy my socks and what I ate for dinner!”

The first scene sets the tone up perfectly. Smug Mark Zuckerberg (played by the always excellent and underappreciated Jesse Eisenberg) is talking about himself to his girlfriend. He doesn’t care that his thoughts aren’t interesting to her and treats her as a lower life form. When his girlfriend says she has to go and study, Mark responds, “You don’t have to study; you go to BU;” implying that she goes to a less challenging school than Mark, who goes to Harvard and just bragged that he got a perfect score on his SATs. His girlfriend, Erica is tired of Mark’s narcissism and breaks up with him telling him, “You are going to go through life thinking that girls don’t like you because you’re a nerd. Let me tell you from the bottom of my heart, that’s not true. [Then a beat] It’s because you’re an as*hole.”

In his rage and feelings of hurt, Mark goes to his dorm and blogs about how Erica is a jerk and posts pictures of different Harvard girls and comparing which one is hotter. Mark’s blog generates so much traffic it eats out the electricity of the Harvard computers. Mark’s blog is a success and this leads to being approached by the Winklevoss twins to make a website where people can look up their friends at Harvard and talk about them and see their pictures. Mark takes this idea and turns it into a more ambitious project where instead of just Harvard students going on a website to see other Harvard students, any person can go on to see any other person, hence what is now known as Facebook.

Mark Zuckerberg isn’t a bully as the previews would lead you to believe. Rather he is a self-absorbed techie lacking social skills, a perfect candidate to build the largest social network ever. A social network where people can believe that they have a lot of friends without ever having (or wanting) to talk to them. This is perfect for a guy like Mark Zuckerberg. The Social Network is about Mark Zuckerberg getting sued by the Winklevoss twins for stealing their idea and by his former and only best friend (well except for the ones on Facebook), Eduardo Saverin (played by Andrew Garfield) for screwing him over by having him removed as the co-founder of Facebook.

The Social Network is well acted by all involved, especially Jesse Eisenberg as Mark Zuckerberg, who clearly has the most depth to him. You alternately hate Zuckerberg for his smug and coldness and admire him for his ambition, brains, and creativity. The writing is typical Aaron Sorkin: fast, clever and biting.  The Social Network is a sad film because it shows how superficial we are as a society. We pretend to care about others, when all we really care about is ourselves.  The Social Network isn’t so much about Mark Zuckerberg as it is about us—wanting to make friends but going about it the wrong way. Mark Zuckerberg may have made Facebook, a superficial social network where no one has to actually socialize, but we are the ones who go on it and help make it a success. I mean how many of us text instead of talking to people face to face or on the phone. The title of the film is a joke and a slap in the face, as the last scene of the film makes clear. I mean how many of our “Facebook friends” do we really talk to? Yep, we might not like the Zuckerberg The Social Network shows, but we are like him—self-deluded narcissists who believe that we have thousands of “friends,” without even knowing what the word really means and how to treat them.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 5.5/10 (4 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Get Low Movie Reviews, Ratings, Trailer and Opinion

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

Get Low has a great opening scene. It’s dark outside, and a house is enflamed becoming totally destroyed while powerful classical music plays in the background. Get Low sets a strong mood from the very beginning. Unfortunately, there aren’t many moments like this in the film. There is a powerful moment when Felix is speaking at his funeral, his face in close-up and doing his best to stifle his tears.

Get Low is well acted by all involved, especially Bill Murray as Frank Quinn, an owner of a funeral home and Lucas Black, Frank’s protégé. Sissy Spacek as Mattie Darrow is completely wasted and isn’t really a flesh out character.

Most of the film revolves around setting up Felix’s funeral, whom Frank is all to happy to help with. The film is well-acted by the three main leads and even though the plot of the film might seem eccentric, the pacing of the film is very low-key and does its best to not heighten the absurdity of having a funeral while still alive.

The biggest weakness of the movie is it’s plodding pace. The movie drags and drags and is far from gripping. Maybe the MTV generation spoiled me, but Get Low is slow and hard to sit through. I wish Get Low did what its title promised and moved at a quicker pace. Get Low is 100 minutes long but feels much longer.

When it’s finally revealed why Felix became a hermit (and it’s obvious why since the film shows many clues that why Felix is doing what he is doing isn’t really a secret for the audience, which quells any questioning the audience might have as to Felix’s strange behavior), the answer is sort of stupid and unconvincing. Felix is supposed to feel guilty for his actions, but comes across as such a stoic man that it’s inconceivable that Felix would be racked with guilt.

Get Low has a few funny lines here and there (such as a sign which reads, “No Damn Tress-passing! Beware of Mule!”) and the acting is more than competent and the film is scenic, but the film also doesn’t grab the viewer. Get Low has about two dramatic scenes and it’s humor is dry at best. Its slow pacing makes the film a chore to sit through. While the film is technically well made, I wish the film was less pensive and more substantial. Get Low might mean getting down to business, but that’s not what this film does. If you have low expectations you’ll get more out of Get Low.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 9.5/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)

Get Low– Best and Worst Movie Moments from Get Low

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

My grandfather always used to say, “no one is as bad as their reputation or as good as their eulogy” and that is what Get Low is about. Get Low, which means “getting down to business,” as the hermetic Felix Bush says to a priest. Felix Bush (Robert Duvall in a remarkably restrained and subtle performance) lived as a recluse for 40 years. “The first 38 years are the hardest,” Felix states.

Felix has a reputation around town as a being a strange man prone to violent outburst. He wants to have a funeral while he is alive to hear what people have to say about him. He wants everyone who has a story to tell about Felix to speak at his funeral. At least that’s what he claims. What Felix really wants is to have a chance to tell his side of the story—to tell people why he lived alone for 40 years and for people to hear what he has to say before making up their mind about what he is really like.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 7.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

The Kids are All Right Movie – Best and Worst Movie Moments from The Kids are All Right

Monday, July 12th, 2010

The Kids are All Right is a good first draft. The film is about the problems that families have. That the film is honest and doesn’t solve all its problems at the end is a plus of the film. A weakness is that the film doesn’t mix humor and drama smoothly and that the characters aren’t interesting enough, thereby making the film fail as a drama. The Kids are All Right has all the ingredients for a successful drama; it just hasn’t learned how to mix the ingredients well so the film is tasty.

The situations that the characters have seem to suggest that the people in the film are well-drawn, but that isn’t the case. The drama in the film isn’t convincing and there are moments when Julianne Moore overacts (which are during the scenes where she is crying). Mark Ruffalo does a good job making his character sympathetic as least, although his portrait as a ladies’ man is hard to swallow (no pun intended).

The children, Jules and Laser are sweet kids who seem to have very real problems, but they aren’t fully developed yet. The storyline is there for The Kids are All Right to be a good film, but is Lisa Cholondeko wants her film to be more than just alright, she needs to make her characters more realistic, identifiable (or sympathetic), and interesting.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo Movie Reviews, Ratings, Trailer and Opinion

Friday, July 9th, 2010

The film, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, based on the novel published posthumously by Stieg Larsson (whose original title was the less subtle and more provocative, Men Who Hate Women) is 2 and a half hours long with nary a wasted frame. The movie is long but not necessarily and I was shocked that 2 and a half hours went by so quickly.

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is a dazzling mystery filled with many twists and turns. But the revelations come from the piecing together of clues and deduction the characters partake in instead of just having surprises cobbled at random. There are no red herrings and if there are, none that the spectator notices or cares about. There was no smell of fish in the theater and if there was then if must have been my feet.

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo opens with investigative journalist Mikael Blomkvist (Michael Nykvist) being found guilty and serving three months for committing libel. Mikael has six months until he has to serve his sentence.

The story also deals with hacker Lisbeth Salander aka “the girl with the dragon tattoo” (Noomi Rapace) who is paid to hack into Mikael’s computer and look at all his files and documents which prove or disprove the truth of the libel suit.

Mikael and Lisbeth gradually converge and work together to solve a case about what really happened to Harriet, the favorite family member of Henrik Vanger (Sven-Bertil Taube), who hasn’t been seen since the 60’s. Mikael is hired to find out what happened to Harriet. Was she killed and if so who killed her? And if not, then what caused her disappearance? There are many exciting revelations that are fascinating to discover whether the logic behind them holds water or not.

In most mysteries, the audience is asked to sit back and enjoy the twists and turns the story takes and to forgive the filmmaker for any lapses in consistency and/or logic. I’m not sure if all the many shocks are possible but the viewer won’t care. There are so many plot complications and fascinating characters that any flaw in the story is a moot point.

The movie might be 2 and a half hours long, but we aren’t bored one minute since there is enough material here for at least three movies. Though there is a lot going on, the movie never feels rushed, which can often happen in a film filled with so much happening. There is a lot going on in the film but not in a way that drowns the viewer with information. You have to pay attention to all the details since the film has faith in the audiences’ intelligence and never says things more than once or goes into expository dialogue.

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is one of the best thrillers to come along in quite some time. The movie is almost too good to seem like a movie made nowadays. The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is as good as the thrillers from the 70s and might be the best one since The Marathon Man.

This is clearly a movie directed by a skilled craftsman. Filled with excellent shots, a good use of music and cinematography. Niels Arden Oplev does a great job at directing the film and maintaining an excellent pace. Nikolaj Arcel and Rasmus Heisterberg do an excellent job translating Stieg Larsson’s novel to the screen. I didn’t read the book the movie is based on, although now I wish I had.

What really makes The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo fascinating to watch are the characters in the film. Every actor does his AND HER (I don’t want to be one of the men who hate women) job superbly. Noomi Rapace goes an excellent job at playing the withdrawn Lisbeth. Although her character is a little too smart to be believable, this is really just a minor quibble. Michael Nyqvist does a great job as Mikael. Special kudos should go to Peter Haber as Martin Vanger, Sven-Bertil Taube as Henrik Vanger, but really there’s not a bum performance in the bunch.

There is a physical relationship between Mikael and Lisbeth. It is typical in films to have co-workers get romantically involved with one another and this is usually done in an ingratiating way. What isn’t typical is the offhanded way it is done here. There are no mushy, insincere exclamations of love. Just casual sex. Which I like. And I find much more honest.

There is a scene in the film when Lisbeth walks up to Mikael’s bed and they f**k. After they are done with what they are doing (which is each other), Lisbeth walks away from Mikael’s bed and nonchalantly says, “Good night.” This scene perfectly encapsulates a moment that too many movies rob us of—knowing the difference between hormones and love.

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo makes us care about what is happening and who it is happening to, which is essential in not just a good mystery but any good movie which unfortunately too few seem to possess.

The movie is confident in its style but not brash about it. The facial expressions, close-up shots on people’s eyes and the use of music all work together to create a symphony of mood, character and feeling.

For those with soft stomachs, be forewarned that the violence on display is unflinching. It isn’t exploitative but shows the importance of what make people who they are isn’t what happens to them but how they react to what happens.

The original title of the film seems more appropriate in certain ways as this film does seem to have a feminist bent to it and shows how women are abused by men and the double standard when they show similar behavior patterns. A nice subtle moment in the film is when Lisbeth is walking down the subway and accidentally bump into a bunch of men. They are pissed that someone, no matter how innocent and unintentional, would dare touch them that they punch Lisbeth in the face, throw her against the wall and pour beer all over her body, then when Lisbeth is defending herself by taking a shard of glass from the remains of the bottle that the men smashed her with, one  member of the gang says, “let’s get out of here, this cu*t is crazy,” thereby showing how she is called the crazy one and the gang who attacked her views themselves as the victim.

Stieg Larsson’s The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is well worth your time. Smart, sophisticated, superbly acted with well-drawn characters, and so entertaining you forget that you are in the theater watching a movie and feel as if you are inside the screen caught up in all the excitement. The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is the first in what I hope will be an excellent trilogy. I eagerly wait for the next installment as the series if off to a great start.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Cyrus Movie – Best and Worst Movie Moments from Cyrus

Friday, June 25th, 2010

Cyrus, the latest movie from the Duplass brothers is strangely watchable despite its obvious flaws. That’s not to say that I recommend the movie just that it’s a watchable bad movie, but a bad movie all the same. You keep waiting for something to happen and to see the reason behind Cyrus’ behavior, but nothing comes out of it. The movie is all tease. It’s like hearing a joke and the person leaves without giving you the punch line. Cyrus is half-baked and can’t decide what it wants to be.

Cyrus is no different from the glib mainstream films that the so-called “Indie culture” loves to pounce on. Sure, its shaky camera makes the style seem different, but being different just do stand out instead of serving a purpose serves as an exercise in self-indulgence. Add to this, a jarring tone, half-baked characters and storyline leads to an empty experience. You might not be bored while watching Cyrus, but after the movie is over you’ll wonder what the point of spending two hours and over ten dollars was for.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 10.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Cyrus Movie Reviews, Ratings, Trailer and Opinion

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

Cyrus, the latest movie from the Duplass brothers is strangely watchable despite its obvious flaws. That’s not to say that I recommend the movie just that it’s a watchable bad movie, but a bad movie all the same. You keep waiting for something to happen and to see the reason behind Cyrus’ behavior, but nothing comes out of it. The movie is all tease. It’s like hearing a joke and the person leaves without giving you the punch line. Cyrus is half-baked and can’t decide what it wants to be.

Cyrus begins with John (the always excellent John C. Reilly) getting invited to a party by his ex-wife (played by Catherine Keener who is underused and given nothing to do with her role). John is depressed that his ex-wife is getting remarried since he still harbors feelings for her. She tells him to meet a girl at the party; she’ll even introduce John to them. “What are you going to say [to them]? This is my ex-husband, who I left and wasn’t good enough for me, but you’ll like him,” John responds to his ex-wife’s offer.

John goes to the party under duress and the party scene is easily the best part of the film. He is truly clueless on how to pick up and interact with girls, a situation a lot of us can relate to.

John does see one girl sitting alone on the couch. She isn’t particularly attractive and the gruffly-looking John has a chance with her. She does seem open to him. “Let me be honest with you. I am really lonely and desperate to find someone. It’s not that I’m depressed or suicidal. I think I’m really awesome and I just need the chance to find someone who can get to know me and see how awesome I really am,” John tells her. This bluntness is a bit much for her to take, so she makes an excuse to get away from the couch.

At the party, John meets the beautiful Molly, who is actually the one who does the flirting, which of course surprises John, not being a man of self-confidence.

John and Molly hook up and develop a relationship and one day meets Molly’s twenty-one year old son, Cyrus (played with remarkable restraint by the usually shrill Jonah Hill). Cyrus seems to love his mother a little too much and doesn’t view her as a mother. Cyrus mentions to John that Molly is Cyrus’s best friend. Cyrus always refers to his mother by her name and by not calling her “mother” represents Cyrus’ lack of understanding of parent-child relationships.

Cyrus goes to the bathroom while his mother is still in the shower, has panic attacks during the night so his mother can come to his bed to coddles him and sleep there.

Molly does nothing to stop Cyrus’ suffocating and inappropriate love for her. She never yells at him (although she never sees any cause to) and always hugs him. She gives in to his requests for obsessive smothering and probably caused it.

When first meeting John, Cyrus acts all nice to him. He invites John to stay at their house for dinner and to spend the night there, but later reveals jealousy. Cyrus feels that John stole his mother’s love and so he retaliates by stealing John’s shoes. Cyrus tries to break up Molly and John’s relationship so he can be the only man in his mother’s life.

There are many problems with Cyrus. One is the terrible directing. The camera movements are distracting and pretentious and instead of bringing the viewer into the film, push the viewer away from it. The camera dollies back and forth without reason. During the opening scene where John’s ex-wife is walking the camera slowly zooms forward in-synch with each step John’s ex-wife takes.

There are a few scenes where the characters speak in voice-over, but instead of looking natural the camera shows the people’s face and their mouths shut while their voice-over is being said. This is distracting and takes the audience out of the film. What is the point of this “artistic” technique? It’s annoying and done arbitrarily.

I’m not against films that have jump cuts, zooms, or other unique camera movements, but these movements should have a purpose behind them. Buffalo ’66 and Breathless have artistic flourishes, but they serve a point. In Cyrus, they serve only as a distraction and as a way to appear unique instead of having the style become the substance.

Another problem with Cyrus is its indecisiveness. The film can’t decide whether it wants to be a comedy or a drama and fails at both. Cyrus isn’t moving enough as a drama and while there are a few laughs sprinkled gingerly throughout the film, there aren’t enough for a comedy.

John C. Reilly is a fabulous actor and does manage to make his character real. John comes across as earnest and his actions are believable (most of the time). John is a character the audience can identify with. Unfortunately, the same can’t be said for the rest of the characters. Jonah Hill doesn’t overdo his creepy momma’s boy persona, but he doesn’t really add anything interesting to him either.

Marisa Tomei, a usually reliable actress, makes Molly one-note. Molly comes across as nice and that’s about the only thing we see of her. Both Molly and John mention how meaningful their relationship is to each other and Molly even mentions that John is the first guy to stay overnight in her house since Cyrus was a little boy. It’s easy to understand why John would fall for Molly. She’s hot and he is desperate and lonely. But there is no reason given why Molly loves John so much.  She says she loves him, but the audience isn’t given a reason why. “Show, don’t tell,” is one of the most basic rules of good storytelling and instead of the Duplass bothers showing us two people in love, they have the characters tell us they are. Marisa Tomei and John C. Reilly have no on-screen chemistry together, which makes their meaningful relationship unbelievable.

Catherine Keener as Jamie, John’s ex-wife is a completely forgettable character and is given no depth to her. Catherine Keener is usually able to make her characters real and memorable, so I don’t know if it’s the fault of the Duplass brothers for underwriting her character or Catherine Keener having an off session.

Cyrus seems unsure of the direction is wants to go, especially when developing the relationship between Molly and her son. Does Cyrus want to go to bed with his mother? Is he just craving attention? Or is he just afraid to be on his own? The movie could have gone in many interesting ways, but instead goes nowhere and has the typical Hollywood ending.

Cyrus is no different from the glib mainstream films that the so-called “Indie culture” loves to pounce on. Sure, its shaky camera makes the style seem different, but being different just do stand out instead of serving a purpose serves as an exercise in self-indulgence. Add to this, a jarring tone, half-baked characters and storyline leads to an empty experience. You might not be bored while watching Cyrus, but after the movie is over you’ll wonder what the point of spending two hours and over ten dollars was for.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 7.3/10 (4 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)

Winter’s Bone Movie Reviews, Ratings, Trailer and Opinion

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

Winter’s Bone is a serious drama about poverty, shot mostly in close-ups so as to better sympathize and identify with the characters’ plight.  The film tells the story of Ree Dolly (played sharply by Jennifer Lawrence), a 17 year old who is responsible for taking care of her younger brother Sonny, and younger sister, Ashlee. Ree teaches them how to hunt, how to cook, how to spell, and how to use a gun (for both food and self-defense). Their mother is mentally ill and their father has left them. However if Ree’s father fails to show up in court the family will be homeless since her father put up their house as bail.

So Ree goes looking for her father. She asks her father’s brother Teardrop (played by John Hawkes), as well as her father’s cousins for help on where he might be found. They either won’t tell Ree where her father is or don’t know.  But the film never quite explains why Ree’s relatives won’t reveal the father’s whereabouts or even what information they have about him.  The family dynamic is very difficult to understand because family members are at once brutal to one another, but not altogether callous.  There is a scene in which Ree’s father’s cousin’s wife, Dale, savagely beats Ree for trying to locate her father, but then later, helps her find him.  While such a change of heart might arguably add greater heft to Dale’s character, it creates confusion.

Ree is so desperate to find her father she tries to enlist in the army for the $40,000 signing bonus. This is actually the best scene in the film. The soldier kindly explains to her that she is too young to enlist, and that even if she does, she can’t take her siblings with her as she mistakenly presumed.  This is one of the only instances in the film where the motivation for characters’ actions are clear.

Though Winter’s Bone is far from a bad film, the film is lugubriously paced and the audience is left in the dark about too many things. Though Jennifer Lawrence does a fine job as the motherly and active Ree, the movie requires too much introspection on the part of the viewer.  Without a great deal of speculation, the characters do not make sense, and ultimately, did not succeed in holding my interest.

Winter’s Bone is directed by Debra Granik (whose first film was Down to the Bone; apparently Ms. Granik has an affinity for the word, bone). The film is shot in a gritty documentary style, which at times seems too deliberate.  The title is provocative and the style is artistic.  The characters are not fleshed out enough, and their actions do not carry the emotional weight that they could under the extreme life circumstances that are portrayed. In this case in trying to be “real,” the film becomes synthetic. The film lacks meat and is all bone.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 9.8/10 (5 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)