Archive for the ‘Comedy Movie Reviews’ Category

Young Adult– Best and Worst Movie Moments from Young Adult

Wednesday, January 4th, 2012

Jason Reitman is one of the freshest directors working today. Jason Reitman makes funny, sharp, bitter comedies that provide some social critique. Each of Mr. Reitman’s films have been better than the previous ones—that is until Young Adult. Young Adult is funny and bitter, but isn’t as sharp, original, and funny that his previous three films. Also, Young Adult seems to not have much to say. There is no damning social criticism or piercing character study (even though Young Adult attempts the latter).

The young adult in question is Mavis Gary, an attractive woman who in a state of arrested development. Mavis Gary (played by the underrated Charlize Theron) was the popular girl is high school who hasn’t grown up (hence, the title, Young Adult) and still thinks she can get what she wants.

Mavis Gary is a ghostwriter for a once popular children’s series of books which now are on the clearance shelf and even at such slashed down prices, have trouble selling.

What Young Adult wants to portray is a character who is unable to understand reality and that what was once popular is no longer. Just like Mavis Gary’s books were popular, now they aren’t. People have their ups and downs as well.

The problem with Young Adult is that the audience knows exactly what is going to happen. The movie is predictable and the film says everything it needs to say in the first 10 minutes and doesn’t progress from there. The film is much like the movie’s main character—Young Adult starts off on fire but after the first 10 minutes just keeps put-put puttering along without knowing that it’s out of gas.

Young Adult is about Mavis Gary’s high school boyfriend, Buddy Slade (played by Patrick Wilson) who is now married with a baby. Mavis plans to drive back to her dead-end hometown and get her boyfriend back. Since Mavis was so popular in school, Mavis thinks that all she has to do is say, “come here, boy” for Buddy to come rolling back into Mavis’s arms.

The movie doesn’t seem to have much to say and is predictable all the way thru. The audience knows that Mavis won’t succeed in breaking up Buddy’s marriage and getting Buddy to fall back in love with her. The audience also knows that when Mavis feels rejected and lonely that she will shack up with the nice unpopular kid from high school, Matt (who is the most dimensional character in the film and is played by Patton Oswalt with both pity and sympathy).

Matt was a victim of a sort of hate-crime when he was in high school. A bunch of bullies beat up Matt, mangled his feet, and bashed his head for being gay, even though Matt isn’t really gay (which is what makes it sort of a hate-crime). Matt lives with his sister, Sandra, who is the only character in the film which admires Mavis; probably because Mavis is the girl Sandra always wishes she could be.

Mavis meets Matt is a bar and they get to talking and become somewhat friends. Matt and Mavis are both two lonely souls without a lot of friends and Mavis leans on Matt whenever she feels rejected. Mavis drives to Matt’s garage and they go out for drinks when Mavis feels the need for company.

The best scene in the film is when Mavis goes to Matt’s place after being rejected by Buddy. Mavis made a fool of herself at Buddy’s daughter’s naming. Mavis feels she needs someone to show her affection, so she goes to Matt’s house, takes off her clothes and fornicates with Matt. Matt is lonely and horny, so he reciprocates. This scene is the most honest and genuine scene in the film. The way Matt quickly takes off his pants, shows that he is eager to just have sex and might not fully care about Mavis’s feelings. And Mavis, likewise takes advantage of Matt’s vulnerability. The scene of Matt and Mavis getting intimate shows a true sex scene—that sometimes people has sex with someone just because they are there and have hormonal needs and not due to feelings of love.

Unfortunately, Young Adult is just an adequate movie. The movie offers chuckles, but no guffaws. Likewise, the movie doesn’t really get too deep into the character’s psyche. It seems to want to say something profound, but doesn’t do so in a way that is original, insightful, or arouses the audiences’ emotions or intellect in any meaningful way.

Every director has its flaws and Young Adult is Jason Reitman’s. Jason Reitman and Diablo Cody’s previous collaboration was Juno (a great film worth seeing). Those expecting something along the lines and quality of Juno will be disappointed.

I was really looking forward to watching Young Adult since Jason Reitman is a talented filmmaker and I’ve really enjoyed his other films. Young Adult is far from awful, it just feels empty with so much lost potential. Young Adult isn’t worth spending over $10 to see in a movie theater, but might be worth watching when it comes on TV and DVD. Until then, this young adult doesn’t recommend seeing Young Adult.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 8.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

The Descendants– Best and Worst Movie Moments from The Descendants

Sunday, November 20th, 2011

In Alexander Payne’s low-key, moving, funny and well acted movie, The Descendants, George Clooney plays Matt King, a lawyer whose wife is in an irreversible coma. The Descendants is Alexander Payne’s first film since 2004’s Sideways, and it’s been way too long since has been behind the camera.

Alexander Payne is one of the best filmmakers working today. His films are modest, biting, and made with both cynicism and a love of humanity. His characters are deeply flawed selfish individuals who the audience can alternately find repulsive and loving. The Descendants is no different.

Matt King’s wife, due to a recent  boating accident has left her into a coma which due to her will, the plug will be pulled in two weeks.

One of the things that I’ve found interesting about humanity is how we treat people differently if they have visible conditions that make their life difficult. If you found out that your friend had cancer, you would probably treat him nicer than if he didn’t have cancer. Many people treat people in wheelchairs nicer (albeit demeaningly) than those who are able-bodied. But why should we? We all have our own baggage and just because our maladies aren’t visible that doesn’t make our life better than those whose maladies are. Shouldn’t we treat people nice whether they have a disease or not? And if we treat someone nicer because he has cancer, isn’t this insincere and demeaning? Do people who are in wheelchairs really need to get special treatment? Can they not handle heartbreak just like everyone else? And if someone wrongs you in a way you find unforgivable should their own misfortune change the way you treat them, even though you feel wronged by them?

The above questions are those which The Descendants ask. Matt King finds out from his daughter, Alexandra (played with sharp wit and intelligence by the unknown and talented Shailene Woodley) that his wife cheated on him. He takes his children to confront the man who slept with his wife. Matt finds out that this guy, Brian Speer (played by Matthew Lillard who proves he can actually play it straight while acting his age and remain fully-dimensional) is married, and Brian’s wife finds out about the affair as well.

While his wife is lying brain-dead in a coma, Matt comes to the hospital and starts yelling at her about how selfish she was and about how wrong it was for her to cheat on him, and that she was selfish and irresponsible to want to leave him and their kids and break up their family to move with Brian. In a later scene, Brian’s wife visits Matt’s wife at the hospital and says that, “I forgive you for sleeping with my husband and for wanting to break up my family. I should hate you but I forgive you.” In another scene, Alexandra visits her mother at the hospital and calls her a whore and how she was wrong to cheat on dad. What makes these scenes funny is how profound they are. It might seem insensitive that Matt, his daughter, and Brian’s wife are so unsympathetic that they would yell at a woman while in a coma, but are they wrong to do this? Matt’s wife (Elizabeth) did act wrong and why should her actions be ignored just because she is in a coma? Does having something bad happen to you mean your sins should be forgiven? I’m not answering these questions, and what makes The Descendants a good movie is that neither does the film; the film just puts such situations out there so you can ponder about these questions yourself.

The Descendants is a road trip movie, where Brian takes his children to Hawaii to confront Brian Speer about the affair. Along with Matt and his two children, his eldest daughter, Alexandra brings her friend Sid (Nick Krause, who is very funny and steals every scene he is in) with them. Sid starts out as a typical surfer-dude type character, but shows depth along the film to make his character more than just a archetype. Sid says what’s on his mind even when inappropriate. When Matt tell’s Elizabeth’s parents that she is in an irreversible coma and is going to die soon. Elizabeth’s father tells his wife (who has Alzheimer’s) that they are going to visit Elizabeth at the hospital. “Really, we are going to visit Queen Elizabeth. How exciting. I always wanted to see a queen.” Sid starts laughing at this and Elizabeth’s father tells him to shut up. Sid doesn’t. “I’m going to punch you,” he says to Sid, which Elizabeth’s father does.

The Descendants doesn’t judge its characters but simply plays events and allows the audience to make their own judgments about them. George Clooney does a great job turning Matt into a moving and sympathetic character (even though he seems to care more about his wife cheating on him than her being in a coma and about to die).

The writing is typical funny and moving Alexander Payne. The directing is modest and there is lovely Hawaiian music in the film. If the film has a flaw it’s that the music is used too much and doesn’t always flow. I wish the music wasn’t used as much as it was. Another misstep is Matt King’s narrating the film. Having a character acting as narrator is a crutch and unless you are Ron Howard in Arrested Development, voice-over narrations should be carefully used. The first 15 minutes or so is almost all narration (it gets a lot better than that afterwards).

Besides for the over-reliance on music and Matt’s narration, The Descendants is a funny, touching, well-written, acted, and directed film that is well worth your time. My only request is that we don’t have to wait another seven years to see Alexander Payne behind the camera.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 5.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)

The Other Guys Movie Reviews, Ratings, Trailer and Opinion

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

It’s been quite awhile since we’ve seen a Will Ferrell movie (the bomb that was The Land of the Lost probably helped contribute to that). Will Ferrell is usually either very good or very bad. He is able to make funny material sound even funnier and bad material sound even worse. The Other Guys isn’t an awful film, but those expecting non-stop laughs will be disappointed.

The Other Guys stars Will Ferrell and Mark Wahlberg as two dumb cops (Allen and Terry, respectively). Plot isn’t important in a film like this, or isn’t supposed to be. The Other Guys is just supposed to make us laugh. For a comedy, too much time is spent on the clichéd plot and not enough on jokes.

The Other Guys’ best and funniest moments are in the beginning. The movie is very funny for the first half hour, but then the momentum slowly stops and the laughs come at a slower rate and the jokes get worse. The Other Guys starts out well enough, but like an old car, loses steam at the end.

Terry (Mark Wahlberg) is an angry cop who is made fun of for accidently shooting Derek Jeter. This idea is only mildly comic, but keeps getting mentioned until it is no longer funny. And that is the main problem with the film. The movie keeps repeating the same jokes over and over again which makes the film come across as thin and desperate, whereas if the movie didn’t feel the need to be repetitive with its jokes but come up with new material, The Other Guys could have been the enjoyable comedy the trailers make it out to be.

Terry continues being referred to as “the cop who shot Jeter.” This nickname may (it’s arguable) have been funny the first time Terry was called this, but isn’t by the half a dozenth time.

Michael Keaton stars as Terry and Allen’s boss, Captain Gene. He unknowingly talks in phrases taken out of TLC songs. “Why are you quoting TLC? Allen asks Gene. “What are you talking about?” Gene responds. This interaction must have occurred at least four times during the movie. Make the joke once and move on!

If given good material Will Ferrell is very funny and while The Other Guys isn’t awful and does have its share of good lines, it also has its share of groaners and is too pleased with itself. A bit of cutting, faster pacing and less repetition would have made The Other Guys worth watching, but as it says, Will Ferrell have many other could comedies that you guys should see instead (I just don’t know what they are).

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 8.7/10 (3 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

The Other Guys– Best and Worst Movie Moments from The Other Guys

Monday, August 9th, 2010

The Other Guys has a bunch of funny lines (not nearly enough, so I won’t quote the few funny ones) and many bad ones. Allen is tired of Terry’s angry outbursts (see I can be repetitive too) and says to him, “You are angry all the time. I feel like I’m partnered with the Hulk.” Ha, ha, hum. There is also a scene where Allen’s mother in law tells Allen messages his wife left him, but the messages are dirty. If a 40 year old talks about sex this isn’t funny, but when a senior citizen does, it suddenly becomes hilarious. Why? Old people aren’t pure and innocent and are just as sick as anyone else (sometimes even sicker).

The Other Guys best laughs are in the first half hour in the film and after that the laughs are far and in between. The beginning of The Other Guys is funny and enjoyable, but this laughter quickly dissipates and subsides into an average comedy by the end, which is a shame. Despite the talent of Will Ferrell, Mark Wahlberg and Michael Keaton, The  Other Guys makes us wish these these guys would have made other comedies that we could watch instead of this one.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Dinner for Schmucks Movie Reviews, Ratings, Trailer and Opinion

Monday, August 2nd, 2010

Dinner for Schmucks is certainly a much broader film than the French original and also a lot more safe. The French film allows us to laugh at what the characters are going through while at the same time show how well-meaning behavior can cause great calamity. Good humor is based on taking a real idea and exaggerating it. It’s a real idea that sometimes good intentions produce disastrous results and the French film allows us to laugh at the truth behind the situations—that as absurd as the farce got, it was always plausible. The Dinner Game allows us to laugh at the absurdity of our own behavior and see the stupidity in all of us.

Unfortunately, the same can’t be said for Dinner for Schmucks. Dinner for Schmucks doesn’t exaggerate real situations and turn them into comedy; instead it has very broad humor. For example, Tim tells Barry to stay in the chair, so when Barry has to get up, he does the Amelia Bedelia and takes the chair with him. Another example of such broad humor is when Barry tries to imitate a Swiss person’s accent and ends up slurring his words.

There are way too few laughs in the film, although the movie does have some good lines. “Do you want to lick cheese off of my naked body?” a former lover of Tim says to Barry. “I think Tim has plates,” is Barry’s response. There’s another scene when a person’s finger gets cut off. “That’s my wife’s favorite finger,” is his reaction.

Steve Carell and Paul Rudd are likable and have good chemistry together. Jemaine Clement as Kieran steals the movie as a narcissistic artist, although he does overdo the comedy a little. And Stephanie Szostak as Tim’s girlfriend is quite cute and lovable.

The comedic situations are as overblown and broad as Jay Roach’s own overrated, Meet the Parents (I expect yelling from you now readers and negative comments for not liking a film almost everyone else seems to find funny). The dinner scene in the film goes on for far too long, even though some of the best laughs are to be had there. Unlike the swift French film on which Dinner for Schmucks is based (whoops, I mean inspired), this remake overstays its welcome.

While Dinner for Schmucks is not as awful as the trailer would suggest, due in large part to Paul Rudd and Steve Carell, it’s not very funny either. It’s not boring and there are enough plot complications to keep you interested, for a comedy the movie isn’t very funny. For those of you who haven’t seen The Dinner Game yet, I strongly recommend it. But for those of you who choose the Americanized version over the original, you’ll end up feeling—well, like a schmuck.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 5.3/10 (3 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)

Dinner for Schmucks– Best and Worst Movie Moments from Dinner for Schmucks

Friday, July 30th, 2010

One of the opening credits reads, “Inspired by Le Dinner de Cons by Francis Veber.” “Inspired.” Seriously?! Can’t remakes be honest about what they are doing? Dinner for Schmucks is based, not inspired (since inspiration denotes influence) on Le Dinner de Cons (or as known is America as The Dinner Game). Be honest filmmakers, Dinner for Schmucks is yet another example of Hollywood remaking everything and isn’t based on inspiring new ideas.

The original French film is a short (less than 80 minutes), clever, and funny farce that shows how a cruel person’s life is shattered by a well-meaning, but dumb person. There is a difference between acting dumb and being dumb. Acting dumb is something most people do. You can be smart but still make foolish mistakes, while a dumb person is stupid not just in their actions but in their thoughts, logic and the way he conducts his life. What makes The Dinner Game such an enjoyable treat is that the “idiot” is truly an idiot. A lovable and well-meaning idiot but an idiot nevertheless. Whereas, in Dinner for Schmucks the “schmuck” does stupid things, says stupid things, but isn’t dumb, thereby removing a lot of the comedy’s bite, which isn’t surprising as this film is directed by Jay Roach.

The film is about Tim (Paul Rudd, affable as always) who in order to get promoted has to invite an idiot for his boss’s dinner party. Tim bumps into Barry (Steve Carell), the “idiot,” while Barry unwilling ruins Tim’s life.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 6.0/10 (3 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: +1 (from 3 votes)

Grown Ups Movie – Best and Worst Movie Moments from Grown Ups

Friday, June 25th, 2010

Adam Sandler’s new comedy, Grown Ups is about as good as you’d expect it to be. Yep, it’s that bad. I’m kidding, it’s actually much much worse. Grown Ups is one of the worst movies I have ever had to sit through and it also depressed the hell out of me.

Grown Ups is nothing but a bunch of people sitting around telling lame jokes and laughing at them. Adam Sandler, David Spade, Chris Rock, Kevin James and the rest of the cast find their own jokes amusing, but there is no reason the audience should since they aren’t putting in any effort to try to be funny.

When they aren’t cracking jokes, the movie has people falling in mud, having an arrow land into one of their feet and having someone stepping on it, people farting and blaming the dog for it as if the characters are dumb enough to believe it, having toilet paper stuck on a woman’s butt, having breast milk land on someone’s face, Kevin James peeing on David Spade, Adam Sandler slapping Rob Schneider in the face with pancakes, having a man in his forties rubbing tongues with his seventy year old wife, having a body builder talk like a chipmunk, hitting people in the nuts, peeing in the pool so the water turns dark blue, having a group of men stare at a woman’s butt for at least two whole minutes. There I told you every attempt at humor that happens in the movie so you don’t have to watch it.

You can thank me later.

There is nothing wrong with having jokes involving sexual humor if the joke is at least clever about it. Simply saying the word, “breast,” isn’t funny. If you think that’s all it takes to be funny, then perhaps you will like the movie.

Grown Ups has the usual preachy message about stop trying to act like children all the time and be grown up. That’s a nice message, don’t you think so? Me too, so let’s prove the message right—that we are able to grow up—by not watching this movie.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 5.6/10 (9 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: +1 (from 3 votes)

Grown Ups Movie Reviews, Ratings, Trailer and Opinion

Friday, June 25th, 2010

Adam Sandler’s new comedy, Grown Ups is about as good as you’d expect it to be. Yep, it’s that bad. I’m kidding, it’s actually much much worse. Grown Ups is one of the worst movies I have ever had to sit through and it also depressed the hell out of me.

What made my movie going experience grueling wasn’t just this unfunny and lazy slog, but that the audience was laughing during the movie. After the movie was over, people in the audience clapped their hands (something rarely done during a movie) and laughed on the way out.

Now I don’t mean to insult the audience members, but watching this mess made me completely unsympathetic towards the masses who complain that there are no good movies coming out of Hollywood anymore. Well, duh. Logic would tell us that if there is nothing good playing, find another way to spend your evening. But instead, people say, “well, it’s better than nothing and we can make fun of the movie later.” The studio heads don’t care why you are seeing the movie, they just care that you do. If you want movies to be better, then stop seeing bad films. As long as the movie is making money, more will continued to be made, so the way to stop the uninspired and unoriginal films from being released is to go on strike until something better comes along, otherwise you are partially to blame.

I apologize for my tirade and I know it might sound unprofessional of me, but I find the job of the film critic to do more than just review the film. I think it is the job of the film critic to hope that by reviewing the film, the success of the movie, financially speaking, will get the money and reputation it deserves and by doing so either more or less films of the ilk will be produced.

If the job of the film critic is to just say whether the film is good or bad, then why have them? Anyone can spew their opinion. Film critics study film. They read articles about films, take classes about them and are looking for objective (or as close as you can get) measures on how to analyze a film and review, rather than just having a visceral response.

Film critics aren’t supposed to just to say what their opinion is, but how they got there. So let me try to do this for Grown Ups.

Grown Ups concerns a bunch of friends from elementary school who meet up with each other after thirty years and reconnect with each other. The movie tries to appeal to those with a sophomoric sense of humor. Grown Ups doesn’t try to be sophisticated and the movie doesn’t fail because of that. It fails because the movie isn’t funny. All the humor in the movie is either of the slapstick variety or of people insulting their friends and family, while everyone around them laughs at the jokes. I guess the people in the film laugh, so the audience doesn’t have to.

The jokes aren’t even clever enough to be sophomoric. I would have preferred that type of film. They are just lame, lazy jokes that it seems were written on the spot. Here are some samples so you can decide for yourself:

When Eric (played by Kevin James) drives up to meet his old friends, his family and his dogs are in the car. “And this must be your wife,” someone says, while looking at the dog.

The grandmother in the film has a bunion on her foot. Everyone goes out to a fast food joint to eat. “They have bunion rings here,” Adam Sandler says to the grandmother. Later in the movie, someone refers to the grandma as “Toe J.  Simpson.” Oh, how corny. And every joke that is made, everyone in the movie laughs.  The audience in supposed to laugh at the jokes, not the cast members.

Grown Ups is nothing but a bunch of people sitting around telling lame jokes and laughing at them. Adam Sandler, David Spade, Chris Rock, Kevin James and the rest of the cast find their own jokes amusing, but there is no reason the audience should since they aren’t putting in any effort to try to be funny.

When they aren’t cracking jokes, the movie has people falling in mud, having an arrow land into one of their feet and having someone stepping on it, people farting and blaming the dog for it as if the characters are dumb enough to believe it, having toilet paper stuck on a woman’s butt, having breast milk land on someone’s face, Kevin James peeing on David Spade, Adam Sandler slapping Rob Schneider in the face with pancakes, having a man in his forties rubbing tongues with his seventy year old wife, having a body builder talk like a chipmunk, hitting people in the nuts, peeing in the pool so the water turns dark blue, having a group of men stare at a woman’s butt for at least two whole minutes. There I told you every attempt at humor that happens in the movie so you don’t have to watch it.

You can thank me later.

There is nothing wrong with having jokes involving sexual humor if the joke is at least clever about it. Simply saying the word, “breast,” isn’t funny. If you think that’s all it takes to be funny, then perhaps you will like the movie.

Grown Ups has the usual preachy message about stop trying to act like children all the time and be grown up. That’s a nice message, don’t you think so? Me too, so let’s prove the message right—that we are able to grow up—by not watching this movie.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 5.8/10 (5 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: -1 (from 3 votes)

Cyrus Movie – Best and Worst Movie Moments from Cyrus

Friday, June 25th, 2010

Cyrus, the latest movie from the Duplass brothers is strangely watchable despite its obvious flaws. That’s not to say that I recommend the movie just that it’s a watchable bad movie, but a bad movie all the same. You keep waiting for something to happen and to see the reason behind Cyrus’ behavior, but nothing comes out of it. The movie is all tease. It’s like hearing a joke and the person leaves without giving you the punch line. Cyrus is half-baked and can’t decide what it wants to be.

Cyrus is no different from the glib mainstream films that the so-called “Indie culture” loves to pounce on. Sure, its shaky camera makes the style seem different, but being different just do stand out instead of serving a purpose serves as an exercise in self-indulgence. Add to this, a jarring tone, half-baked characters and storyline leads to an empty experience. You might not be bored while watching Cyrus, but after the movie is over you’ll wonder what the point of spending two hours and over ten dollars was for.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 10.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Cyrus Movie Reviews, Ratings, Trailer and Opinion

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

Cyrus, the latest movie from the Duplass brothers is strangely watchable despite its obvious flaws. That’s not to say that I recommend the movie just that it’s a watchable bad movie, but a bad movie all the same. You keep waiting for something to happen and to see the reason behind Cyrus’ behavior, but nothing comes out of it. The movie is all tease. It’s like hearing a joke and the person leaves without giving you the punch line. Cyrus is half-baked and can’t decide what it wants to be.

Cyrus begins with John (the always excellent John C. Reilly) getting invited to a party by his ex-wife (played by Catherine Keener who is underused and given nothing to do with her role). John is depressed that his ex-wife is getting remarried since he still harbors feelings for her. She tells him to meet a girl at the party; she’ll even introduce John to them. “What are you going to say [to them]? This is my ex-husband, who I left and wasn’t good enough for me, but you’ll like him,” John responds to his ex-wife’s offer.

John goes to the party under duress and the party scene is easily the best part of the film. He is truly clueless on how to pick up and interact with girls, a situation a lot of us can relate to.

John does see one girl sitting alone on the couch. She isn’t particularly attractive and the gruffly-looking John has a chance with her. She does seem open to him. “Let me be honest with you. I am really lonely and desperate to find someone. It’s not that I’m depressed or suicidal. I think I’m really awesome and I just need the chance to find someone who can get to know me and see how awesome I really am,” John tells her. This bluntness is a bit much for her to take, so she makes an excuse to get away from the couch.

At the party, John meets the beautiful Molly, who is actually the one who does the flirting, which of course surprises John, not being a man of self-confidence.

John and Molly hook up and develop a relationship and one day meets Molly’s twenty-one year old son, Cyrus (played with remarkable restraint by the usually shrill Jonah Hill). Cyrus seems to love his mother a little too much and doesn’t view her as a mother. Cyrus mentions to John that Molly is Cyrus’s best friend. Cyrus always refers to his mother by her name and by not calling her “mother” represents Cyrus’ lack of understanding of parent-child relationships.

Cyrus goes to the bathroom while his mother is still in the shower, has panic attacks during the night so his mother can come to his bed to coddles him and sleep there.

Molly does nothing to stop Cyrus’ suffocating and inappropriate love for her. She never yells at him (although she never sees any cause to) and always hugs him. She gives in to his requests for obsessive smothering and probably caused it.

When first meeting John, Cyrus acts all nice to him. He invites John to stay at their house for dinner and to spend the night there, but later reveals jealousy. Cyrus feels that John stole his mother’s love and so he retaliates by stealing John’s shoes. Cyrus tries to break up Molly and John’s relationship so he can be the only man in his mother’s life.

There are many problems with Cyrus. One is the terrible directing. The camera movements are distracting and pretentious and instead of bringing the viewer into the film, push the viewer away from it. The camera dollies back and forth without reason. During the opening scene where John’s ex-wife is walking the camera slowly zooms forward in-synch with each step John’s ex-wife takes.

There are a few scenes where the characters speak in voice-over, but instead of looking natural the camera shows the people’s face and their mouths shut while their voice-over is being said. This is distracting and takes the audience out of the film. What is the point of this “artistic” technique? It’s annoying and done arbitrarily.

I’m not against films that have jump cuts, zooms, or other unique camera movements, but these movements should have a purpose behind them. Buffalo ’66 and Breathless have artistic flourishes, but they serve a point. In Cyrus, they serve only as a distraction and as a way to appear unique instead of having the style become the substance.

Another problem with Cyrus is its indecisiveness. The film can’t decide whether it wants to be a comedy or a drama and fails at both. Cyrus isn’t moving enough as a drama and while there are a few laughs sprinkled gingerly throughout the film, there aren’t enough for a comedy.

John C. Reilly is a fabulous actor and does manage to make his character real. John comes across as earnest and his actions are believable (most of the time). John is a character the audience can identify with. Unfortunately, the same can’t be said for the rest of the characters. Jonah Hill doesn’t overdo his creepy momma’s boy persona, but he doesn’t really add anything interesting to him either.

Marisa Tomei, a usually reliable actress, makes Molly one-note. Molly comes across as nice and that’s about the only thing we see of her. Both Molly and John mention how meaningful their relationship is to each other and Molly even mentions that John is the first guy to stay overnight in her house since Cyrus was a little boy. It’s easy to understand why John would fall for Molly. She’s hot and he is desperate and lonely. But there is no reason given why Molly loves John so much.  She says she loves him, but the audience isn’t given a reason why. “Show, don’t tell,” is one of the most basic rules of good storytelling and instead of the Duplass bothers showing us two people in love, they have the characters tell us they are. Marisa Tomei and John C. Reilly have no on-screen chemistry together, which makes their meaningful relationship unbelievable.

Catherine Keener as Jamie, John’s ex-wife is a completely forgettable character and is given no depth to her. Catherine Keener is usually able to make her characters real and memorable, so I don’t know if it’s the fault of the Duplass brothers for underwriting her character or Catherine Keener having an off session.

Cyrus seems unsure of the direction is wants to go, especially when developing the relationship between Molly and her son. Does Cyrus want to go to bed with his mother? Is he just craving attention? Or is he just afraid to be on his own? The movie could have gone in many interesting ways, but instead goes nowhere and has the typical Hollywood ending.

Cyrus is no different from the glib mainstream films that the so-called “Indie culture” loves to pounce on. Sure, its shaky camera makes the style seem different, but being different just do stand out instead of serving a purpose serves as an exercise in self-indulgence. Add to this, a jarring tone, half-baked characters and storyline leads to an empty experience. You might not be bored while watching Cyrus, but after the movie is over you’ll wonder what the point of spending two hours and over ten dollars was for.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 7.3/10 (4 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)